Going Back To The One That They Should Have Not Left In The First Place

Why Magna Carta?

Ancient Rights, Modern Warnings, and the Fight for Constitutional Accountability

Magna Carta as a Written Witness to Rights
The episode opens by framing the Magna Carta as a written statement of rights that the host says were already understood before being set down in formal language. The introductory segment highlights due process, property protections, limits on taxation, proportionate fines, and the need for witnesses in legal accusations as principles carried forward into later constitutional thinking.

Biblical Foundations and Constitutional Duty
The host connects the Magna Carta, the American founding, and the Constitution to a biblical worldview. He argues that rights come from God rather than government, and he repeatedly says that constitutional law should be studied, preached, proclaimed in legislatures, and enforced in courts of justice.

Installed Leaders, Media Narratives, and Public Submission
A major portion of the program criticizes political figures and the mainstream media, with the host claiming that many officeholders are installed rather than legitimately supported by the people. He uses examples involving public appearances and controversial political figures to argue that Americans too often submit to leaders they do not truly support.

Warnings About Immigration, Islam, and Cultural Change
The host and callers discuss Muslim immigration, school leadership, and local policy changes through the lens of constitutional law, biblical judgment, and national identity. The discussion includes sharp criticism of political leaders, allegations of intentional demographic change, and concerns that communities are being pressured to accept policies they oppose.

Callers Reinforce Local Concerns
Several callers join the program to add local observations from Minnesota, Texas, Tennessee, and Indiana. Their comments focus on immigration, school boards, religious accommodations, elected officials, and the need for citizens to take action rather than merely complain about what they see happening around them.

A Closing Appeal to Faith, Action, and Accountability
The episode closes with a spiritual and civic appeal. The host urges listeners to see the current moment as an opportunity to stand up, enforce law, expose wrongdoing, and live out faith through action, repeatedly grounding that message in biblical passages and his view of constitutional responsibility.

For One To Know Where They Are Going, They Need To Know Where They Came From

A Nation Must Remember Its Source to Know Its Future

A Broadcast Built Around Elections, Memory, and Public Trust

The episode opens with a long prerecorded montage centered on voter ID, election fraud allegations, and public confidence in elections. The segment presents examples involving Indiana, Texas, Pennsylvania, ACORN, the Franken-Coleman Senate race, and the DNC, while arguing that identity safeguards are necessary to protect election integrity. This opening frames the larger episode as a call to confront what the program describes as institutional lawlessness and public complacency.

Returning to the Foundations Before the Fourth of July

The host introduces the central theme that a people must know where they came from in order to know where they are going. He connects this idea to Woodrow Wilson’s statement about America’s Christian origins, the Declaration of Independence, the Fourth of July, and the claim that taxation without representation was only one of many grievances against Great Britain. He emphasizes that the Declaration was, in his view, a catalog of crimes and a record of resistance to tyranny.

Election Fraud, Media Narratives, and Installed Power

A major portion of the program addresses the host’s claims about voter fraud, media manipulation, fake public support, and political installation. He discusses Mike Lindell, a voting-machine defamation lawsuit, Heritage Foundation election-fraud data, Hillary Clinton’s campaign optics, Barack Obama’s reported crowd and social-media numbers, and Minnesota political figures including Tim Walz, Keith Ellison, Ilhan Omar, and Mayor Frey. These claims are presented as part of his broader argument that media and political systems manufacture consent while hiding or minimizing fraud.

The Constitution, Natural-Born Citizenship, and the Two-Party System

The host moves into constitutional commentary, criticizing what he describes as widespread ignorance among representatives and candidates. He discusses Nancy Mace, natural-born-citizen requirements, the Second Amendment, Article II, Article IV, Article VI, and the Bill of Rights. He also rejects the right-left party framework, calling it unconstitutional and presenting the two-party system as a divisive political construction rather than a legitimate constitutional structure.

Christian Nation Arguments and the Role of Moral Law

Hour two turns heavily toward the host’s view that America’s founding, law, and liberty are inseparable from Christianity and biblical morality. He cites inscriptions, state capitol references, Moses imagery, John Locke, William Blackstone, Charles de Montesquieu, the Treaty of Tripoli, John Adams, George Washington, and Arlington Cemetery to argue that American law and government rest on Christian foundations. He also rejects “separation of church and state” as commonly presented, arguing that the phrase is used to silence Christian influence in public life.

Warnings, Historical Memory, and the Final Call to Action

In the final portion, the host continues urging listeners to study American history, resist tyranny, and act rather than merely complain. He discusses public education, constitutional ignorance, the moral responsibility of churches, national judgment, war, the “Son of the Republic” reference, John Quincy Adams, and the need for Christians to fight spiritually and publicly for righteousness. The episode closes with a call to attend the Sunday church service and the host’s recurring sign-off, “Love you by what we do.”

What We As A People Fail To Condemn Will Be Judged

Condemning What Corrupts: Virtue, Judgment, Surveillance, and Moral Accountability

Mike Lindell Joins Bradlee Dean LIVE

Faith, Freedom, and the Fight for Minnesota’s Future

A Confrontational Opening on Media Narratives and Moral Framing

The episode begins with a forceful opening commentary about the Matthew Shepard case, media framing, public morality, and what the host presents as a broader pattern of narrative control. The introductory material moves from that example into a Christian constitutional framing, using quoted historical and biblical material to argue that the nation's civic order depends on biblical principles, public accountability, and resistance to what the host views as false or manipulative media narratives.

Bradley Dean Sets the Stage for Mike Lindell

After the program introduction, Bradley Dean welcomes listeners, gives the call-in number, promotes Sons of Liberty Media, and explains that Mike Lindell will join the show shortly. The host emphasizes that he wants to ask direct questions rather than create a hostile interview, while also making clear that he intends to discuss Donald Trump, Minnesota politics, election concerns, cultural issues, and Lindell's campaign for governor.

Self-Defense, Law, and a Pastor's Response to Threats

Before the Lindell interview begins, the host discusses a Louisiana pastor, identified in the transcript as Tony Spell, and presents a clip in which the pastor explains why he responded strongly to threats against his family. Dean uses the clip to argue that Christians are not required to passively accept threats or injustice, connecting the story to broader comments about lawful resistance, oppression, and what he believes is the proper response to criminal behavior.

A Cultural and Religious Argument About Public Morality

The next portion of the show centers on the host's criticism of modern cultural trends, the Boy Scouts' abuse claims and settlement fund, federal appointments, sodomy laws, moral responsibility, and biblical standards. The discussion is framed through the host's religious worldview, with repeated claims that God's law, common law, and constitutional principles should define public morality rather than media pressure, political messaging, or cultural trends.

Mike Lindell on Donald Trump, Faith, and Public Life

When Mike Lindell joins the program, he recounts his personal history as a former crack cocaine addict and alcoholic, his conversion and recovery, his work with churches, and the vivid dream he says preceded his meeting with Donald Trump. Lindell describes the 2016 meeting as a divine appointment, explains how he became close friends with Trump, and says that his public support for Trump led to major backlash against him and his company.

Minnesota, Election Claims, and Lindell's Governor Campaign

The interview closes with Lindell discussing his campaign for governor of Minnesota, his claim that he is polling first, his hope for Trump's endorsement, planned budget and immigration proposals, alleged fraud in Minnesota government programs, voting machines, Dominion dropping its lawsuit against him, and the need for campaign resources. Dean ends by thanking Lindell, directing listeners to Sons of Liberty websites, and inviting future engagement with the program and upcoming events.

The Narrative That Is Designed To Lead You Nowhere

When Narratives Lead Nowhere: Media, Controlled Opposition, and the Call to Discernment

A Warning About Controlled Narratives

The episode opens with Bradley Dean arguing that controlled opposition, conservative media figures, and political language have helped mislead American Christians and conservatives. He frames the program around the claim that many people complain about national decline while feeding on media, entertainment, and political commentary that he believes keeps them disconnected from Scripture, the Constitution, and meaningful action.

Conspiracy, History, and the Media Label

A large portion of the show focuses on the word conspiracy and the host's argument that the phrase conspiracy theory is used to discredit people who ask questions. He lists examples that he says were dismissed before later being acknowledged or exposed, including the Dreyfus Affair, the mafia, MKUltra, Operation Mockingbird, Watergate, Operation Northwoods, COINTELPRO, Iran-Contra, Operation Paperclip, and other historical or political topics.

Biblical Foundations Versus Political Talking Heads

Dean contrasts popular conservative commentators and political personalities with what he presents as a biblical and constitutional standard. He criticizes figures he says are treated as conservative leaders while not grounding their commentary in Christian doctrine, biblical law, and constitutional accountability, and he repeatedly urges listeners to judge movements and personalities by their fruit.

Media Scripts, Democracy Language, and Public Conditioning

The program includes discussion of media anchors reading similar scripts about threats to democracy, which Dean uses to argue that national news narratives are coordinated and controlled. He insists that the United States is a constitutional republic rather than a democracy and uses his reported experiences in schools and colleges to argue that professors and media institutions have taught young people the wrong framework for understanding government.

Culture, Morality, and the Conservative Movement

The host then shifts into criticism of modern political and media figures who, in his view, normalize conduct he describes as contrary to Scripture and American law. He discusses school boards, media platforms, Fox News, Republican figures, public personalities, and conservative organizations, tying these topics to a larger argument that the modern conservative movement is often led by people who do not represent the moral and biblical standards he believes the country needs.

Charlie Kirk Allegations and the Final Call to Discernment

The final portion centers on Dean's claims and questions about Charlie Kirk, Turning Point USA, Candace Owens, Erika Kirk, alleged assassination narratives, missing or unreleased evidence, and what he calls controlled opposition. He ends by warning listeners that narratives can lead people nowhere unless they seek truth, demand accountability, and prepare to answer before God for what they do, say, and tolerate.

Columbine Survivor Tells Us All What The Media Did Not Want Us To Know

Eyewitnesses, Media Narratives, and the Columbine Story Revisited

Conspiracies, Scripture, and the Media Frame

The episode opens with a long argument about the word “conspiracy,” with the host claiming that the phrase “conspiracy theory” is used by media institutions to discredit people who question official narratives. He connects the topic to Scripture, historical commentary, and examples he says show that some conspiracies once dismissed as theories were later acknowledged or investigated.

A Christian Constitutional Lens on Current Events

The program repeatedly frames political and media criticism through a Christian constitutional worldview. Promotional and quotation segments emphasize biblical principles, American founding ideas, civil liberty, moral law, and the stated mission of the program as a politically neutral but explicitly Christian effort to address public issues.

Challenging Official Narratives About Tragedies

Before the interview, the host discusses several major historical and modern events, including assassinations, wars, September 11th, Ruby Ridge, Waco, Oklahoma City, Parkland, and other school shootings. He presents these examples as reasons listeners should question mainstream media narratives, pay attention to eyewitness accounts, and ask who benefits when facts are suppressed or simplified.

Jen Thompson’s Columbine Eyewitness Account

The central interview features Jen Thompson, introduced as a Columbine survivor who was a sophomore at the school on April 20, 1999. She describes speaking with Eric Harris shortly before the attack, seeing a student or former student carrying a heavy duffel bag, hearing gunfire, barricading in a science classroom, seeing Dylan outside the door, and observing another man she believed was involved.

Questions About Responders, Witnesses, and What Was Omitted

The host and guest focus heavily on claims that there were more people involved than the public narrative allowed. Jen discusses the wounded teacher Dave Sanders, calls for help, the delay before SWAT entered, the path students were taken out of the building, and her memory of seeing deceased students. The host adds names from what he describes as eyewitness accounts and argues that the public was not given the full story.

Caller Duke, Additional Claims, and a Call for Courage

After the main radio segment, caller Duke says he worked near the Columbine campus shortly before the shooting and saw propane tanks he believed were suspicious. The host connects Duke’s account to the broader theme of hidden information, then closes by urging listeners to value truth, defend children, stand courageously, question official accounts, and return to God as the foundation for action.

Hour 1: The Catalogue Of Crimes

Hour 2: Resistance To Tyranny Is Obedience To God

The Catalog of Crimes and the Fight for a Christian Republic

Christian Warfare and the Fire of Heaven

The episode opens with a theological argument that the Christian life is not passive, easy, or merely inspirational, but a form of spiritual warfare requiring vigilance, discipline, self-denial, and obedience. The host contrasts what he calls the professed church in America with historical Christian voices and argues that many Christians have softened the character of Christ into something tolerant, fruitless, and defeated rather than bold, conquering, and faithful.

Florida, God First, and the Constitutional Oath

After returning from an event in Florida, the host describes speaking to Republican Party leaders under the theme of putting God first. He uses that experience to discuss the Constitution, the oath of office, the phrase "in the year of our Lord," and his belief that American government was meant to be accountable to biblical authority and the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

The Declaration as a Catalog of Crimes

A major theme of the program is Samuel Adams' description of the Declaration of Independence as a catalog of crimes. The host reviews the Lee Resolution, the Committee of Five, the structure of the Declaration, and the grievances against King George III, then argues that the Bill of Rights functions as a set of limits on government power and a warning against the forms of tyranny the founders rejected.

Entertainment, Bloodsport, and Modern Rome

The host connects modern entertainment culture to ancient Rome, criticizing UFC-style fighting, the White House event he discusses, and public hunger for blood and spectacle. He argues that Americans are being entertained away from liberty and moral seriousness, comparing the crowd's appetite for violent entertainment to the Roman Coliseum and the persecution of Christians.

Pride Month, Public Morality, and Political Compromise

A large portion of the episode centers on the host's condemnation of Pride Month, homosexuality, transgender identity, drag performances, and public officials or institutions that he says promote what Scripture condemns. These remarks are framed by the host as a biblical and constitutional critique of moral tolerance, public policy, and government leaders whom he views as installed or corrupt.

Justice, Tyranny, and the Call to Resist

The closing material returns to the Declaration of Independence, the preamble of the Constitution, justice, standing armies, taxes, and the host's claim that America has tolerated far more than the founders did. The episode ends by warning that liberty has been replaced by licentiousness, urging listeners to read the Word of God, oppose tyranny, and return to biblical and constitutional standards.

Resistance To Tyranny Is Obedience To God

The Instruction Manual of Liberty and the Duty to Resist Tyranny

A Warning About Abandoning the Instruction Manual
The episode opens with an argument that nations decay when they abandon the principles on which they were founded. The host frames Scripture and the founding documents as instruction manuals for liberty, arguing that removing or altering them leads to disorder, corruption, and loss of freedom.

Founding Faith, Constitutional Design, and Public Responsibility
The host cites figures such as Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Rush, Noah Webster, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and others to argue that the American constitutional system was rooted in Christian moral principles. He repeatedly emphasizes that the people are the government and that representatives act only through delegated authority.

The Declaration as a Catalogue of Grievances
A major portion of the episode continues the previous discussion of Samuel Adams' description of the Declaration of Independence as a catalogue of crimes. The host highlights grievances against King George III, including refusal to assent to laws, obstruction of justice, standing armies, taxation without consent, and tyranny unfit for a free people.

Moral Compromise, Pride Month, and Public Institutions
The host sharply criticizes what he describes as cultural and governmental tolerance of conduct he believes Scripture condemns. He discusses Pride-themed public events, a minor-league baseball team refusing Pride jerseys, and claims that public institutions and media outlets are normalizing behavior he argues violates biblical and constitutional principles.

Schools, Media, Crime, and the Duty to Protect Children
The program includes commentary on alleged crimes against children, school-related concerns, and media silence or distortion. The host plays or describes a Chris Hansen segment and takes a call from Craig in Michigan about teachers and school staff, using the exchange to argue that parents and citizens must stop excusing problems they believe are harming children.

Resistance to Tyranny and the Call to Know the Law
The episode closes by returning to the idea that resistance to tyranny is obedience to God. The host urges listeners to know Scripture, the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and the Bill of Rights, while caller Bob reinforces the point that the people must enforce the republican form of government and hold representatives accountable.

The Catalogue Of Crimes

The Catalog of Crimes and the Warning Against Tolerated Tyranny

A Fiery Opening on Spiritual Warfare

The episode begins with a forceful religious reflection on Christianity as spiritual warfare rather than passive comfort. The opening commentary contrasts what it presents as a weakened professed church with biblical images of boldness, discipline, obedience, and heavenly fire. Quotations from Christian writers and references to Scripture are used to argue that genuine faith requires struggle, vigilance, and resistance to darkness.

Florida Reflections and the Call to Put God First

After the program introduction, the host describes returning from an event in Florida and reflects on the audience response there. He frames the experience around the phrase “God first,” emphasizing that, in his view, God must be both the starting and ending authority for public life, private conduct, and national direction. He also comments on the heat in Florida and the opportunity to explain the mission and origins of his work.

The Declaration as a Catalog of Crimes

A central theme of the episode is the host’s reading of the Declaration of Independence as a documented list of grievances against tyranny. He references the Committee of Five, the structure of the Declaration, and Samuel Adams’ description of the document as a “catalog of crimes.” The host ties this to the Constitution, the oath of office, the Bill of Rights, and his belief that America’s governing principles rest on biblical foundations.

Entertainment, Bloodlust, and Modern Rome

The host then turns to recent public spectacle, comparing contemporary combat-sport entertainment and a reported White House UFC event to Roman gladiatorial games. He argues that public appetite for violence, blood, and spectacle reflects moral decline. Using the image of Rome’s colosseums and the persecution of Christians, he warns that people can be entertained out of their freedoms while ignoring the constitutional limits of public office.

Tolerance, Pride Month, and Controversial Social Commentary

The program moves into a controversial religious and political critique of Pride Month, homosexuality, transgender identity, Zionism, public figures, and media commentary. The host repeatedly frames these issues through his interpretation of biblical law, repentance, and national judgment. These claims are preserved as the speaker’s opinions and statements, not as verified conclusions.

Returning to Justice, Resistance, and Constitutional Duty

Near the close, the host returns to the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, focusing on justice, domestic tranquility, common defense, taxation without consent, standing armies, and the role of representative government. He argues that America has tolerated far more than the founders would have accepted and says the next program will continue the theme of the Declaration’s grievances as a warning for the present.

The Most Censored Radio Show In The Country

False Peace, Public Corruption, Censorship, and the Call to Constitutional Accountability

False Peace and Biblical Accountability

The episode opens with Bradley Dean arguing that many Americans, especially professed Christians, are living in what he calls a false peace. He frames the country’s moral and political problems through scripture, repeatedly contrasting biblical truth with what he sees as public silence, compromised churches, and a representative government that has moved against God’s commandments.

Christian Foundations and Public Duty

Dean draws on figures such as Noah Webster, Thomas Jefferson, John Dickinson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Reverend Peter Thacher to support his argument that America’s civil order was meant to rest on biblical and constitutional principles. The program emphasizes the idea that lawful resistance, public accountability, and criticism of corrupt leaders are not optional but necessary duties for citizens.

Censorship, Platform Removal, and Media Reach

A major theme of the broadcast is censorship. Dean says a previous live feed was removed after he criticized conduct he believes harms children, and he presents that removal as evidence of big-tech suppression. He also highlights past listenership statistics from Genesis Communications Network and argues that every attempt to silence the program should be answered by expanding outreach through newspapers, billboards, radio, and other platforms.

Government, Gun Ownership, and Public Distrust

Dean discusses falling public confidence in government and links that distrust to rising gun ownership and Second Amendment concerns. He argues that politicians who attack constitutional rights should be held personally accountable rather than shielded by public office. He also says lawsuits funded by taxpayer money allow officials to advance restrictive policies without personal consequences.

Pride Month, Media Clips, and Policy-Sensitive Claims

The episode includes extended commentary on Pride Month, gender identity, child protection, media figures, and alleged crimes. Policy-sensitive slurs and demeaning identity-based language were omitted from the corrected transcript package at the user’s instruction to omit content that violates policy. The remaining transcript preserves the structure of Dean’s argument as a speaker claim: that he believes cultural, media, and government institutions are normalizing conduct he condemns through his biblical worldview.

Minnesota, Fraud Allegations, and Election Integrity

The final portion focuses on Minnesota, Tim Walz, Keith Ellison, Somali community statistics mentioned in inserted clips, fraud allegations, Medicaid and social-services concerns, Ohio-related claims, and election-integrity complaints. Dean presents these issues as evidence that government systems are failing and that citizens must demand justice, paper-based elections, transparency, and constitutional enforcement.

Mercy In The Midst Of Judgement

The Gay Manifesto, Pride Month Agenda, and Biblical Mercy in the Midst of Judgment. Mercy, Judgment, Free Speech, and the Biblical Standard for Public Life.

The Gay Manifesto Exposed
The host opens by reading the full text of Michael Swift’s 1987 Gay Manifesto, which was published in Gay Community News and entered into the Congressional Record, detailing explicit plans to seduce and recruit youth, infiltrate institutions, rewrite laws, and target churches and heterosexual society.  

Chai Feldblum and Government Interest
The host discusses Chai Feldblum’s writings and nomination by Barack Obama, highlighting her argument that religious liberty must yield to government interests in advancing gay equality, leaving no room for conscientious objection based on faith.  

Mercy Belongs to the Obedient
Drawing from James and other scriptures, the host explains that biblical mercy rejoices against judgment only for those born of the Spirit who keep God’s commandments, contrasting this with an idolized “all-love” God lacking justice, sovereignty, or wrath.  

Scott Pressler and Conservative Hypocrisy
The host criticizes Turning Point USA and Charlie Kirk for promoting openly gay activist Scott Pressler as a conservative leader in Wisconsin, contrasting his views with Scripture and calling out Fox News for platforming him as controlled opposition.  

Big Tech Censorship and Child Protection
A video is played exposing a transgender youth advocate charged with raping a six-month-old; the host condemns Facebook and big tech for censoring criticism of such crimes under hate-speech policies, arguing this inverts justice and endangers children.  

Caller Henry and Call to Bold Action
Caller Henry urges Christian men to confront corruption and examine themselves per 2 Corinthians 13:5; the host agrees, stressing that parents and citizens must condemn sin rather than tolerate it, warning that failure to magnify the law invites national judgment while Leviticus 26 and Romans 1 outline God’s sovereign blessings and curses.

Mercy and Judgment in Biblical Perspective
The episode centers on the host’s argument that mercy must be understood within the framework of divine judgment, repentance, and obedience to God’s commandments. He rejects what he describes as an unbalanced picture of God as only love, grace, and mercy, arguing instead that biblical teaching also includes sovereignty, holiness, justice, wrath, and accountability.

Christian Ethics, Civil Liberty, and Moral Law
The program repeatedly ties American civil liberty to Christian moral law, using quotations attributed to Noah Webster, Thomas Jefferson, John Dickinson, Theodore Roosevelt, and Reverend Peter Thacher. The host and prerecorded segments present the Bible and the U.S. Constitution as the two main standards by which public life, law, and civic responsibility should be measured.

Culture War, Public Policy, and Free Speech
A major portion of the episode discusses cultural conflict, religious speech, and what the host portrays as a clash between biblical teaching and modern social policy. The host criticizes big tech censorship, arguing that platform restrictions silence lawful religious and political speech while protecting wrongdoing or unpopular public-policy agendas.

Political Conservatism, Public Figures, and Accountability
The host discusses conservative politics, TPUSA, Scott Pressler, Charlie Kirk, Donald Trump, Fox News, and other political or media figures as examples in his broader criticism of what he sees as compromised leadership. These comments are presented as the host’s opinion and are frame]]> SONS of LIBERTY Radio with Bradlee Dean

Well, He Was Right!

Media Manipulation, Government Confessions, and Nietzsche’s Challenge to a Hypocritical Church

Media Defamation Tactics
The host opens by detailing George Zimmerman’s lawsuit against NBC for editing his 911 call to make him appear racist in the Trayvon Martin case, contrasting the edited and unedited recordings to demonstrate deliberate media manipulation. He immediately connects this example to broader attacks on truth-tellers.

MSNBC Hit Pieces on the Ministry
The host describes how MSNBC and Rachel Maddow twice aired hit pieces on his “You Can Run But You Cannot Hide” ministry in collaboration with an activist, accusing the network of lying and defaming him because his high-school programs and constitutional advocacy threaten their propaganda machine. He labels MSNBC’s slogan “Forward” as communist.

Radical Homosexual Lobby Exposed
The host condemns the radical homosexual lobby for claiming victim status while perpetrating crimes, citing Kevin Jennings and GLSEN’s book “Queering Elementary Education,” historical laws against homosexuality in all 50 states until 1973, and statistics on child molestation and recruitment. He argues this lobby serves as a political battering ram against the Constitution.

Government Insider Confessions
Clips are played from former CIA agent John Stockwell admitting to election manipulation, creating wars, death squads, and assassinations worldwide, and from Ted Gunderson exposing chemtrails as genocide sprayed by unmarked planes. The host stresses that mainstream media covers for these government crimes.

Caller Discussion and Message of Hope
Caller Tracy from Long Island attempts to connect current events to biblical prophecy involving Egypt, Israel, and Revelation 13:17. The host listens but refuses to deliver a gloom-and-doom message, instead calling listeners to righteous living, self-governance, and holding representatives accountable rather than relying on federal agencies.

Nietzsche’s Critique and True Christianity
The host examines philosopher Frederick Nietzsche’s statement that Christianity’s problem is its refusal to do what Christ commanded, arguing this reveals a widespread lack of genuine Christianity marked by hypocrisy. He cites multiple New Testament passages from 1 John, Titus, and the third commandment to urge obedience, regeneration, and living so that enemies fear the believer’s life.

Hear Ye, Hear Ye!

Hear Ye, Hear Ye: Public Judgment, Moral Crisis, and the Cost of Silence

Public Abuse Allegations and Institutional Cover-Ups
The episode opens with a prerecorded segment connecting the Penn State scandal and the Franklin cover-up through allegations of abuse, institutional silence, missing evidence, and the vulnerability of children served by charitable organizations. The segment presents these cases as examples of public trust being violated and argues that powerful individuals and institutions were protected while victims were left without justice.

Historical Warnings and Biblical Government
The program then moves into historical and religious quotations, including remarks attributed to Noah Webster, Thomas Jefferson, John Dickinson, Theodore Roosevelt, and other public figures. These segments frame the episode around the host’s view that American civil government should be measured by biblical morality, constitutional limits, and public accountability rather than by the power of officials or institutions.

Apathy, Entertainment, and Public Responsibility
The host argues that Americans have become distracted by spectacle, entertainment, politics, and corporate influence while losing sight of liberty, justice, and civic vigilance. He compares modern public entertainment to historical forms of public spectacle and repeatedly warns that people who remain passive in a time of corruption help create the conditions for greater judgment, tyranny, and social disorder.

Crime, Recidivism, and Judicial Failure
A major theme of the episode is the host’s claim that repeat offenders, weak courts, and delayed consequences are endangering the public. He presents recidivism statistics and multiple crime examples to argue that the justice system is failing victims, rewarding criminals, and generating money for institutional interests while neglecting what he describes as biblical justice and lawful consequence.

Constitutional Rights and Corrupt Officials
The episode also returns to constitutional government, especially the Second and Fourth Amendments, gun bans, confiscation concerns, and the responsibility of representatives to obey the Constitution. The host argues that citizens must not obey unconstitutional decrees and that public officials who violate constitutional limits should be lawfully removed rather than treated as rulers over the people.

Religious Judgment, Political Influence, and Closing Appeal
Near the end, the host discusses religious leaders, political figures, institutional deception, Freemasonry, intelligence influence, and the Epstein files as part of a broader argument that corruption survives because citizens and churches fail to bring lawful judgment. The closing appeal centers on the idea that people should not blame God for evil while refusing, in the host’s view, to obey God’s commandments and enforce justice.

Franklin Coverup and Penn State Parallels
The host opens the program by comparing the Franklin Coverup involving Larry King’s alleged procurement of children from Boys Town for powerful figures and blackmail to the Jerry Sandusky scandal at Penn State where the Second Mile charity was used to abuse boys with university officials covering it up.

Suspicious Deaths and Investigations
Details are given of investigator Gary Carradori’s plane explosion that scattered child pornography evidence seized by the FBI and the mysterious disappearance of district attorney Ray Grecar whose computer showed searches on destroying hard drives both tied to attempts to expose the abuse rings.

Biblical and Historical Foundations
Quotations from Noah Webster Thomas Jefferson John Dickinson and other founders are p]]> SONS of LIBERTY Radio with Bradlee Dean

Hour 1: Obeying Unconstitutional Decrees Is On You
Hour 2: Foaming Out Their Shame

Unconstitutional Decrees, Public Morality, and America’s Responsibility to Enforce Justice

Constitutional Resistance and Public Duty

The episode begins with commentary on gun confiscation, unconstitutional decrees, and the host’s argument that law enforcement officers and elected officials are bound by constitutional limits rather than by unlawful commands. The host presents the Second and Fourth Amendments as essential protections against government overreach and argues that public officials who attempt to enforce unconstitutional orders become agents of state power rather than lawful guardians of the people.

Crime, Recidivism, and Judicial Accountability

A major portion of the broadcast focuses on violent crime, repeat offenders, recidivism, and the host’s criticism of judges and courts that he believes are too lenient. He argues that a justice system driven by money, prison economics, and institutional corruption creates repeat criminals while failing victims. He connects that argument to a biblical worldview, saying that abandoning God’s commandments leads to disorder, injustice, and social collapse.

Repentance, Judgment, and National Responsibility

The host repeatedly returns to the phrase “amend your ways,” using Jeremiah as a warning to churches, civil leaders, and the American public. He presents repentance as both a personal and national obligation and says that the people must stop tolerating wickedness, idolatry, and injustice. In his view, America’s public problems continue because citizens complain about corruption while refusing to lawfully confront and remove corrupt leaders.

The Second Amendment and Representative Government

The broadcast discusses bump-stock bans, proposed gun restrictions, sheriffs and attorneys refusing to enforce gun bans, and the host’s belief that representatives are servants rather than rulers. He argues that the Constitution restrains government, not the people, and that obeying unconstitutional decrees makes citizens complicit in their own loss of liberty. He also warns that disarmament can lead to broader speech restrictions and government control, using the United Kingdom as an example in his commentary.

Religious Morality, Sexual Politics, and Public Controversy

The second half of the transcript contains extended religious and political commentary on Pride Month, homosexuality, transgender issues, modern Israel, women in pulpits, and churches that affirm positions the host rejects. These remarks include strong condemnations based on the host’s interpretation of Scripture and law. The transcript preserves these statements as the host’s viewpoint and as part of the episode content, without treating them as independently verified facts.

Promotional Segments, Listener Calls, and Closing Claims

The program includes repeated prerecorded segments promoting Sons of Liberty resources, church services, donations, Christian heritage material, BBS Radio TV, and a segment criticizing Alfred Kinsey and the Kinsey Reports. Caller Margy briefly contributes statistics and agreement with the host’s moral claims, while caller Craig comments on churches, LGBTQ acceptance, and Zionism. Near the end, the host returns to church leadership, biblical authority, and claims about names connected to the Epstein files before the transcript cuts off mid-thought.

No Means No, Americans!

When Government Says Gun-Free, Bradlee Dean Says Americans Must Say No

A Warning Against Gun-Free Zones

The episode opens with a prepared commentary arguing that government agencies, private businesses, and policymakers should be held accountable when people are injured or killed in shootings inside gun-free zones. The commentary claims that most mass public shootings since 1950 have taken place in gun-free zones and compares blaming gun manufacturers for criminal acts to blaming car companies, knife makers, or utensil makers for misuse of their products. The speaker uses biblical references, including Cain and Abel, to argue that moral responsibility belongs to the person who commits the act rather than the tool used. The opening also frames arbitrary government and activist courts as threats to constitutional liberty.

Bradlee Dean’s Central Message of No

Bradlee Dean begins the live portion of the program by telling listeners that the episode’s theme is “no means no.” He argues that many political figures are not truly voted in by the people but are installed through money, media coverage, and promises that are later broken. He focuses especially on Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger, whom he says is acting against the rights of the people after presenting herself differently during her rise to office. Dean also discusses Ken Paxton and Texas politics, warning listeners to follow the money behind replacement candidates and to question whether the same powers that controlled one official may control the next.

Second Amendment, the Bill of Rights, and State Resistance

A major focus of the episode is Dean’s argument that elected officials have no delegated authority to restrict what he describes as God-given rights protected by the Second Amendment. He cites the preamble to the Bill of Rights and presents the Bill of Rights as a set of restrictions on government, not permissions granted by government. Dean points to examples from Illinois and Virginia, saying that counties, sheriffs, commonwealth’s attorneys, and other officials can refuse to enforce unconstitutional gun restrictions. He repeatedly urges Americans to understand their constitutional position, reject unlawful decrees, and say no when officials attempt to exceed their authority.

Federal Agencies, Armed Government Power, and Public Accountability

Dean spends a substantial portion of the episode discussing federal law enforcement and the number of armed personnel in agencies such as Customs and Border Protection, the Federal Bureau of Prisons, the FBI, ICE, the Bureau of Land Management, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, the U.S. Capitol Police, and others. He questions why so many agencies have armed personnel and arrest powers and argues that many of these agencies are unconstitutional or aimed against the American people. He also discusses the drug problem, claiming that government agencies help create crises and then present themselves as problem solvers. This section reinforces his broader argument that citizens must understand the limits of government power.

Callers, Media Criticism, and Political Strategy

During the call-in portion, Tracy from Longmont discusses the dollar bill, biblical prophecy, and claims about hidden meanings connected to money and Revelation. Dean challenges the caller to focus less on a small number of powerful people and more on living boldly enough that thos]]> SONS of LIBERTY Radio with Bradlee Dean

Apparently, They Forgot About Doing Their Jobs

When the Watchmen Only Point: Controlled Opposition, Political Theater, and the Missing Hammer of Justice

A Wrestling Analogy for Political Theater

The episode opens by comparing professional wrestling to political theater, arguing that audiences often knowingly participate in staged conflict while believing they are watching meaningful opposition. The host uses examples from wrestling rivalries and friendships to frame the idea that public enemies may be privately aligned, and he applies that framework to politics, media personalities, and promoted public figures.

Controlled Opposition and Manufactured Choices

The host’s central claim is that many popular commentators, activists, candidates, and influencers are elevated by powerful interests to control public reaction rather than produce justice. He argues that figures who appear suddenly on national platforms, gain large followings, or receive media amplification should be examined skeptically, especially when their exposure does not lead to prosecution, accountability, or lawful remedy.

Criticism of Trump and Political Idolization

A major portion of the episode criticizes Donald Trump’s public behavior, the host’s perception of Trump’s self-promotion, and the loyalty of Trump’s supporters. The host discusses clips about Trump’s posts, his desire for symbolic honors, criticism of a federal judge, and the broader danger the host sees in political worship, arguing that supporters should measure leaders by biblical and constitutional standards rather than personal loyalty.

Representatives Who Highlight Crimes but Do Not Prosecute

The recurring phrase “apparently they forgot about doing their job” is used to criticize elected officials who, in the host’s view, publicly identify corruption but fail to bring lawful consequences. The host applies this criticism to figures including Josh Hawley and Tom Emmer, arguing that simply talking about alleged fraud, scandal, or misconduct is not enough if representatives do not pursue justice through proper legal channels.

Biblical, Constitutional, and Moral Framing

Throughout the program, the host frames political issues through biblical morality, constitutional duty, and historical quotations from figures such as Theodore Roosevelt, Noah Webster, Thomas Jefferson, John Dickinson, and Reverend Peter Muhlenberg. He repeatedly argues that civil government depends on moral law, that injustice destroys liberty, and that citizens must understand law rather than accept political narratives at face value.

Caller Reflections on Political Attachment

In the final portion, callers add analogies about public attachment to political figures. Steve compares loyalty to destructive addiction, while Chris describes monkeys trapped because they will not let go of nuts, using that as a metaphor for people clinging to the belief that Trump is a political savior. John adds that the current political class is not made up of builders, reinforcing the host’s broader argument that public officials are failing to construct or restore justice.

It's Not Going Too Far - It's Gone Too Far

When a Nation Stops Resisting: Repentance, Power, and the Warning That America Has Gone Too Far

A Warning That “It Has Gone Too Far”
The episode centers on the host’s argument that American culture, politics, religion, and public institutions have moved beyond ordinary decline into what he describes as open rebellion against biblical and constitutional standards. He frames the program around the idea that the issue is no longer whether society is “going too far,” but that it has already “gone too far,” and he repeatedly calls for repentance, resistance to corruption, and renewed Christian conviction.

Criticism of Churches, Pastors, and Public Morality
The opening and recurring religious sections criticize pastors and churches that the speaker believes have failed to confront sin and cultural decay. He contrasts contemporary religious leadership with historical preachers and reformers, argues that the church should be “on the offensive,” and says believers should raise disciples rather than spectators. Throughout the episode, biblical passages are used as the foundation for the host’s commentary on repentance, moral responsibility, and public courage.

LGBTQ Issues, Children, and Criminal Allegations
A major portion of the episode focuses on the host’s opposition to LGBTQ-related cultural messaging, especially as he connects it to concerns about children, schools, and alleged sex crimes. The host discusses a reported conviction involving a pride organization founder, refers to pedophiles in prison, and argues that public tolerance strengthens movements he believes should be condemned by law and Scripture. These statements are presented in the transcript as the host’s strongly expressed views and claims.

Immigration, Islam, and Claims About Political Installation
The host also discusses Muslim populations in New York and Minnesota, claiming that fears of being “conquered” are misplaced because the numbers do not support that conclusion. At the same time, he argues that Muslim officeholders are “installed” rather than genuinely elected and claims that immigration has been used treasonously against the American people. He presents these views within a larger religious framework, saying that God can use a smaller population either to bless or judge a nation.

Modern Israel, Zionism, and Religious Allegiance
Another major theme is the host’s distinction between Jewish people and Zionism, with extended criticism of modern Israel, Zionist influence, and Christian leaders who support Israel in ways the host rejects. He references Charles Spurgeon, John Hagee, Jack Hibbs, Greg Locke, TPUSA, Donald Trump, Noahide laws, and U. S.-Israel military integration, arguing that many religious and political leaders are deceiving the public. The transcript preserves these controversial assertions as claims made by the speaker, not verified conclusions.

Government Control, Kill Switches, Surveillance, and Final Call to Repent
Near the end, the host shifts to government control, car “kill switches,” taxation, alleged geofencing, surveillance, data gathering, and media manipulation. He argues that Americans have tolerated too much lawlessness from public officials and private power structures, and he warns that freedom may be lost if people do not act. The episode closes with the host urging listeners to question what they hear from media, reject fear, and repent while there is still time.

Hour 1: And People Call This Gratitude?

Hour 2: See How This Works?

Gratitude Requires More Than Memorials

Arlington, Memorial Day, and the Meaning of Honor
This episode of Sons of Liberty Radio opens with Bradlee Dean reflecting on Arlington Cemetery and the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier as symbols of reverence, sacrifice, discipline, and national gratitude. He describes the guards’ exacting preparation, the solemnity of the changing of the guard, and the meaning of honoring those who died for the constitutional republic. From there, he connects Memorial Day to a broader question: whether Americans truly honor fallen soldiers merely by speaking words of remembrance, or whether honor requires living for the laws, liberties, and moral principles those soldiers died to defend.

Gratitude, Constitutional Wars, and Political Accountability
Bradlee continues by distinguishing between honoring veterans and questioning unconstitutional wars. He says the country has been at war for most of its existence and argues that soldiers and citizens need to understand the Constitution’s limits on war powers. He recalls a past experience in Minneapolis radio when a manager accused him of disrespecting the office of the president for criticizing Barack Obama, while Bradlee argued that tolerating presidential crimes is the real disrespect. His central theme is that gratitude requires refusing to tolerate corruption in government or heresy in the church, rather than offering ceremonial praise while ignoring violations of law.

Climate Change, John Coleman, and Speaking Against Public Deception
A major segment focuses on what Bradlee calls the climate-change hoax and the history of efforts to use climate policy to tax and control people. He plays or references a clip involving Weather Channel founder John Coleman challenging CNN’s framing of climate change and insisting that science is not a vote. Bradlee uses Ecclesiastes 1:4 to argue that Scripture teaches the earth abides, and he challenges Christians to believe that claim actively rather than remain silent while political and media institutions promote narratives he believes are false. In his view, Coleman’s willingness to confront CNN is an example of public courage and gratitude.

Healthcare, Whistleblowers, and Demands for Justice
Bradlee then shifts to healthcare, COVID-era controversies, and what he describes as a lack of justice for officials such as Anthony Fauci and leaders of institutions like the CDC, NIH, and WHO. He plays or discusses a clip from Linda Peeno, who describes denying a medical procedure that would have saved a man’s life and being rewarded for saving a company money. Bradlee uses this testimony to argue that the healthcare system has been corrupted by money and institutional incentives. He frames public inaction in the face of whistleblower testimony as another sign of ingratitude and calls for people to demand justice against those he believes are responsible.

Foreigners, Flags, Immigration, and National Respect
In the later portion of the episode, Bradlee discusses foreign nationals, assimilation, disrespect for the American flag, and what he views as signs of judgment from Deuteronomy 28. He argues that people coming into the country who disrespect the flag or refuse to assimilate should be deported, and he connects this to broader concerns about Chinese nationals, Muslims in office, foreign influence, and domestic insurrection. Caller Craig from Michigan joins briefly to discuss healthcare, climate, and space-anomaly claims, while caller Margie from Minnesota brings up Donald Trump and South Africans entering the United States. Bradlee uses both calls to reinforce his view that Americans are tolerating conditions that undermine their own country.

Trump]]> Sons of Liberty Radio with Bradlee Dean

See How This Works?

When Authority Rebels Against God’s Law

Romans 13, Civil Authority, and the Limits of Submission
This episode of Sons of Liberty Radio opens by challenging a common Christian response to government overreach: “What about Romans chapter 13?” Bradlee Dean argues that many Christians use Romans 13 either because they are misinformed or because they want an escape from personal responsibility. He reads or paraphrases the passage and emphasizes that civil authority is limited by its God-defined purpose: to punish evil and praise good. From the beginning, the episode frames submission to government not as unlimited obedience, but as obedience within the boundaries of God’s law and moral order.

Christian Hypocrisy, Constitutional Ignorance, and the Role of the Church
After the show’s introductory and promotional material, Bradlee discusses recent conversations in which people criticized Christians, churches, and politics while, in his view, misunderstanding both Scripture and the Constitution. He argues that the church is supposed to be the moral compass of society and that the American system of government was institutionalized on common law rooted in biblical principles. He rejects the idea that Christianity and government are separate subjects, citing James Wilson and the imagery of Moses, the Ten Commandments, John Locke, Montesquieu, and Blackstone in civic settings. His central point is that many who criticize Christian involvement in public life do so from a biblically and constitutionally illiterate framework.

False Professions, Celebrity Christianity, and Fruit-Based Judgment
A substantial portion of the episode addresses public figures who profess Christian beliefs while, according to Bradlee, producing fruit that contradicts those claims. He uses Roman Reigns, professional wrestling, Hollywood actors, Denzel Washington, Chris Pratt, and political figures as examples of what he sees as public religious language without biblical obedience. Bradlee argues that merely saying Jesus is the Son of God is not the same as walking in the light, and he repeatedly points listeners to the biblical teaching that people should be judged by their fruit. He connects this to the broader problem of desensitization, entertainment, and Christians accepting worldly professions of faith without discernment.

The Biblical Case Against Unquestioned Obedience to Tyranny
The heart of the episode returns to Romans 13 and argues that no human authority has unlimited jurisdiction. Bradlee uses examples from Scripture and history to test the idea of absolute submission, including the medieval custom of prima nocta, Moses defending a Hebrew from an Egyptian taskmaster, Elijah confronting Ahab and Jezebel, David refusing to surrender to Saul, Daniel disobeying a corrupt law against prayer, the three Hebrew children refusing to bow, John the Baptist rebuking Herod, the apostles continuing to preach, and Paul suffering imprisonment. His argument is that Scripture does not teach blind submission to evil, but rather obedience to God above tyrannical or unlawful commands.

Resistance, Forefathers, and Christ as the Model of Authority
Bradlee then connects biblical resistance to American founding-era examples and Christian history. He cites Patrick Henry, Abraham Lincoln, Charles de Montesquieu, and other references to argue that liberty is the right to do what God’s law permits, not permission to do whatever one wants. He also points to Jesus confronting the money changers, speaking boldly, rebuking religious hypocrites, and warning the women on the way to Calvary as examples that love and authority can include confrontation. Bradlee’s repeated phrase “resistance to tyranny is obedience to God” becomes a key summary of his view that Christians are not called to submit to corrupt rule when it violates God’s commands.

Ministry Callings, Correction, and the Need for Biblical Discernment
Near the end, callers Henry and John briefly enter the conversation, and Bradlee uses John’s call to discuss different ministry callings, including apostles, prophets, teachers, evangelists, and pastors. He argues that correction, reproof, and instruction are not unloving but are part of Scripture’s purpose and part of genuine love. Bradlee distinguishes different functions within the body of Christ while insisting that all should ultimately point toward repentance and the kingdom of heaven. The episode closes with reminders about Sons of Liberty Sunday services, merchandise, support opportunities, and the call for listeners to study Scripture, judge by fruit, and resist tyranny through obedience to God.